Skip to content

Latest commit

 

History

History
43 lines (37 loc) · 3.47 KB

File metadata and controls

43 lines (37 loc) · 3.47 KB

Technical Lead Call 13 February 2024 (online; one weeks after design date)

Participants

  • Attendees: @headmetal @rbeucher @flicj191 @ehogan @valeriupredoi @bouweandela

  • Absentees: @sloosvel @schulnam (DLR forced holiday)

  • Chairs and minutes takers: @valeriupredoi

  • Special mention: first meeting for @headmetal @rbeucher @flicj191 (welcome, folks!)

Proposed topics for discussion (to be ordered then added to the Agenda section at the start of the meeting)

  • Review of Pending Action Items
  • Update about CMEW @ehogan
  • OBS data versioning ESMValGroup/ESMValTool#3452 @bouweandela
  • Managing connections and dealing with knowledge gaps when personnel move @bouweandela

Topics discussed

  • @valeriupredoi: TLT meeting scheduling
  • Next release: likely in April/May by @ehogan and team
    • @rbeucher is asking what we do for a release: @bouweandela giving a brief overview of the workload needed
    • TLT members have left/moved, so we are short on people
    • @ehogan - MetO still working on the RTW (recipe test workflow) - it works on a small scale (prototype)
    • recipes break since dependencies change but the maintainers don't run them periodically
    • @rbeucher - could run different recipes on different machines to speed the process up: comparison vs previous run could still be made?
  • OBS data versioning ESMValGroup/ESMValTool#3452 @bouweandela - to be looked at by @valeriupredoi as well
  • CMEW update: demo session went very well: data was found, CDDS-ed, and immediately passed to ESMValTool for running a small recipe, well done!
  • Managing connections and dealing with knowledge gaps when personnel move @bouweandela: no single point of failure - we need redundencies in place ie people that know that "special stuff" too:
    • @rbeucher is asking about the Consortium ie at least 1 FTE per institute: @bouweandela responds: variablity in FTE/institute depending on available funding; MetO about the same (@ehogan and Alistair, mainly)
    • @bouweandela recommends that we work together on things whereever this is possible within the constraints posed by funding sources
    • @bouweandela recommends ensuring that we write down critical information
    • @ehogan proposes we create a table of expertises among ourselves, so we discover gaps, and identify the overlaps; @bouweandela also proposes teams' description - useful for identifying knowledge bases -> @bouweandela proposes contact at the Steering Committee as well.
  • @rbeucher is asking about PR reviewes - can they help? Yes, please, cheers! Contributions most welcome, and documentation in the PR review process (@bouweandela is giving a brief overview of the PR merging process).
  • @rbeucher bunch of Australia-specific (ocean mainly) recipes (not ESMValTool-ed, but lots interested in porting them to ESMValTool) -> great to have them, @bouweandela poroposes bringing own specialist reviewers, faster and more accurate review.