You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Browse filesBrowse the repository at this point in the historyBrowse files
authored
Persist LW/SW fluxes across non-radiation timesteps (ESCOMP#426)
Tag name (The PR title should also include the tag name):
Originator(s): @jimmielin
Description (include issue title and the keyword ['closes', 'fixes',
'resolves'] and issue number):
- Companion PR to ESCOMP/CAM-SIMA#527
- Persists LW/SW fluxes even in non-radiation timesteps consistent with
CAM
- Fixes standard name (missing `_to_coupler`) from post-interstitial
List all namelist files that were added or changed:
List all files eliminated and why:
List all files added and what they do:
List all existing files that have been modified, and describe the
changes:
(Helpful git command: `git diff --name-status
main...<your_branch_name>`)
```
M schemes/rrtmgp/rrtmgp_lw_calculate_fluxes.F90
M schemes/rrtmgp/rrtmgp_lw_calculate_fluxes.meta
M schemes/rrtmgp/rrtmgp_sw_calculate_fluxes.F90
M schemes/rrtmgp/rrtmgp_sw_calculate_fluxes.meta
- Persists LW/SW fluxes even in non-radiation timesteps consistent with CAM
M schemes/rrtmgp/rrtmgp_post.meta
- add _to_coupler suffix to standard name to pass the fluxes to the coupler.
```
List all automated tests that failed, as well as an explanation for why
they weren't fixed:
Is this an answer-changing PR? If so, is it a new physics package,
algorithm change, tuning change, etc?
If yes to the above question, describe how this code was validated with
the new/modified features:
---------
Co-authored-by: Haipeng Lin <hplin+github@ucar.edu>
Co-authored-by: Haipeng Lin <hplin@ucar.edu>
0 commit comments