Hi — I maintain FrontendAtlas, an independent frontend interview-prep project.
I’m preparing a public, no-sign-up benchmark that compares unbounded DOM append, content-visibility: auto, and windowed virtualization at 1,000, 10,000, and 50,000 variable-height rows. The planned package includes raw samples, JSON/CSV downloads, an accessible chart, a fixed-seed fixture and runner, and separate data/code licenses.
The “Virtualize long lists and tables” rule already asks readers to compare mounted nodes, memory, scrolling, and interaction cost. Before proposing any source change, would this kind of reproducible evidence fit the rule’s Sources or Resources section once the public URL and final measurements are live and independently verifiable?
I maintain the proposed resource. It is not published yet, so I’m not asking you to review or add a link now. No paid, affiliate, sponsored, or particular rel placement is being requested. If this is not the right use of issues, please close it and I won’t follow up here.
Disclosure: this note was drafted with AI assistance and reviewed before posting.
Hi — I maintain FrontendAtlas, an independent frontend interview-prep project.
I’m preparing a public, no-sign-up benchmark that compares unbounded DOM append,
content-visibility: auto, and windowed virtualization at 1,000, 10,000, and 50,000 variable-height rows. The planned package includes raw samples, JSON/CSV downloads, an accessible chart, a fixed-seed fixture and runner, and separate data/code licenses.The “Virtualize long lists and tables” rule already asks readers to compare mounted nodes, memory, scrolling, and interaction cost. Before proposing any source change, would this kind of reproducible evidence fit the rule’s Sources or Resources section once the public URL and final measurements are live and independently verifiable?
I maintain the proposed resource. It is not published yet, so I’m not asking you to review or add a link now. No paid, affiliate, sponsored, or particular
relplacement is being requested. If this is not the right use of issues, please close it and I won’t follow up here.Disclosure: this note was drafted with AI assistance and reviewed before posting.