Repository navigation
Should the wiki's scriptlet Resources Library be sorted alphabetically? #4166
Replies: 3 comments 1 reply
This makes sense to me. Otherwise, it is possible that a user may not realize that there are both trusted and untrusted versions of certain scriptlets. That being said, they should be reading the entire wiki page, but that's another issue. |
|
What I've been considering is making a separate, alphabetical menu that is collapsed by default or a table where one column is purpose-based, second is alphabetical. Or something similar. E.g. an alphabetical table, where next column is the trusted version and a related scriptlet, while still existing on its own in the first column. Or a list with sub points for related scriplets. We'd probably need to make a few versions to compare what looks best. |
|
Or perhaps, based on the release date, the newer ones would be at the very bottom or the very top. |
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Is the list of scriptlets on the wiki's Resource Library page sorted in any specific order? I was considering editing the page to sort scriptlets in alphabetical order, similar to AdGuard's list, as I find the current list hard to navigate.
The one pattern I currently see is that scriptlets with similar functionality are loosely grouped together, (ie:
set-cookieandremove-cookie), andtrustedscriptlets are grouped with their non-trusted counterparts (ie:set-cookieandtrusted-set-cookie). Although, a lot of scriptlets with similar functionality would be grouped together alphabetically anyway, and trusted variants could be linked in the "See also" section.Thoughts on reorganizing scriptlets in alphabetical order?
All reactions