[techgopal]

Launch row "docs section pages" (queue-sonnet.md). #740 already added index.md for the root and every section and a description on every hand-written page. What was left:

• Get started lands on the quickstart: docs/get-started/index.md is now the quickstart (install, SQL and DataFrame example, EXPLAIN) with the next-step links below it. quickstart.md is removed; its links, the docs-example runner, the README-equality test and the check-compat docs test point at the index. The stale "Nothing is published to PyPI yet" paragraph is gone.
• Description on every generated page: SQL function pages (first sentence of Spark's usage text) and their index, Python pages and index (first docstring line), Rust crate pages and index, configuration, metrics, Spark Connect coverage, and the hand-written SQL index. One shared docs_ext::front_matter for the xtask generators; the Python generator has its own.

Checked: docs-sql --check, connect-coverage --check, gen_python_docs.py --check, the docs link checker, xtask/common/exec/cli doc tests, clippy and deny (pre-commit).

Not run here: docs-rust (needs rustdoc-md; the Rust pages were patched by the same rule, so the nightly docs-reference job will confirm) and docs_examples_run.py (needs a built wheel; the CI wheels job runs it).

[coderabbitai]

Important

• Trigger review

This repository does not receive automatic reviews because it has fewer than 10 stars.

Run configuration

• Source mode: Auto
• Repository: KrishivAI/krishiv-engine
• Branch: main
• File: .coderabbit.yaml
• Commit: 6f40584
• Layers: Repository YAML
• Review profile: ASSERTIVE
• Plan: Advanced
• Run ID: 7ac0b832-c01b-4c88-902f-c74612da193f

• Autofix · Keep fixing CodeRabbit findings and required CI, and resolving merge conflicts

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

Share

• X
• Mastodon
• Reddit
• LinkedIn

[chatgpt-codex-connector]

Codex Review Summary: ✅ Completed

This comment shows the latest Codex review activity on this pull request.

Review	Status	Commit	Review trigger
📝 Code Review	✅ Completed 2026-11-14T08:22:40.298304Z	97545f3	Manual request

ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

• Open a pull request for review
• Mark a draft as ready
• Comment "@codex review" or "@codex security review".

Codex reacts with 👀 while any review is running, comments if it has suggestions, and reacts with 👍 once all reviews finish with no findings.

[chatgpt-codex-connector]

💡 Codex Review

Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.

Reviewed commit: 6572e82e4e

ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

• Open a pull request for review
• Mark a draft as ready
• Comment "@codex review".

If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.

Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".

[chatgpt-codex-connector]

Retain the source-build instructions until a package is published

For new users following this page, the installation instructions now offer only pip install "krishiv[pyarrow]", although both README.md and docs/index.md still explicitly state that nothing has been published to PyPI. The deleted quickstart explained that users must build and install the wheel from the repository first; removing that guidance leaves the getting-started flow without an available installation path. Preserve the source-build instructions and qualify the PyPI command until the package is released.

Useful? React with 👍 / 👎.

[techgopal]

Agreed: nothing is on PyPI yet, so the build-from-source note (maturin build in python/) goes back on this page, matching README.md and docs/index.md. The edit is made; the commit is waiting on a permission block in my session and will be pushed to this branch as soon as it clears.

[codecov]

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.

📢 Thoughts on this report? Let us know!

[codspeed]

Merging this PR will not alter performance

1 warning

⚠️ 22 benchmarks are dominated by system calls

System calls cannot be simulated consistently and are left out of the measure. The reported value understates the real cost. Switch to the Walltime instrument to measure them.

Learn more about system calls

See affected benchmarks

✅ 198 untouched benchmarks
⏩ 5 skipped benchmarks¹

---

_{Comparing p3/docs3-launch-sections (97545f3) with main (b63c335)}

Footnotes

1. 5 benchmarks were skipped, so the baseline results were used instead. If they were deleted from the codebase, click here and archive them to remove them from the performance reports. ↩

[techgopal]

@codex review

[chatgpt-codex-connector]

Codex Review: Didn't find any major issues. What shall we delve into next?

Reviewed commit: 97545f333f

ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

• Open a pull request for review
• Mark a draft as ready
• Comment "@codex review".

If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.

Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".

[techgopal]

main merged in for the CI disk fix (#776); lane: git pull before your next push