Improve pruning of SkewCommutative rings - #4653
Draft
joel-dodge wants to merge 1 commit into
Draft
Conversation
joel-dodge
changed the title
d-torrance
added
Core
Contributor
Author
|
Pruning improvements were moved to #4658 The local ring stuff here is incomplete and requires more investigation into how the LocalRings package works. |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Better support for SkewCommutative variables when pruning a ring. Remap skew indices to match with new variables array.
When configuring a LocalRing, try pruning the residue ring before computing it's field of fractions.