Remove references to physcons module from SCM

[scrasmussen]

SOURCE: Soren Rasmussen, NSF NCAR

DESCRIPTION OF CHANGES:

• Removes direct dependencies on the global physcons module from CCPP physics schemes.
• Supplies physical constants through explicit CCPP arguments, with standard names, units, and metadata.
• Makes each scheme’s required constants visible in its interface instead of relying on hidden module state.
• Improves portability and reuse of physics schemes in different host models and configurations.
• Simplifies dependency tracking, testing, and maintenance by centralizing ownership of physical constants in the host/CCPP framework.

ISSUE: #652

TESTS CONDUCTED:

• builds on Derecho
• ufs-wm Derecho regression tests

RELATED PRs:

• SCM - Remove references to physcons module from SCM #653

  • ccpp-physics - Remove direct physcons module dependencies from CCPP-Physics ccpp-physics#1235

• UFSWM - Remove direct physcons module dependencies from CCPP-Physics ufs-community/ufs-weather-model#3323

  • UFSATM - Remove direct physcons module dependencies from CCPP-Physics NOAA-EMC/ufsatm#1131
    • ccpp-physics - Remove direct physcons module dependencies from CCPP-Physics ufs-community/ccpp-physics#381
      • c3 - Remove direct physcons module dependencies from C3 ufs-community/c3#4
      • MYNN-SFC - Remove direct physcons module dependencies from MYNN MYNN-SFC#32

[hertneky]

Code changes look good to me. Only 1 minor comment to take or leave.

[hertneky]

should we add the description for this one that's being added?
!< molecular wght of o3 (\f$g/mol\f$)

[scrasmussen]

I'll add that, thanks!

[grantfirl]

Were all new additions to scm_physical_constants.F90/meta from UFS? (e.g. did you have to come up with any new metadata?)

[dustinswales]

Need to remove the intent attribute from the host-model metadata.
Other than that this looks fine.
Thanks for making these changes!

[dustinswales]

The intent attribute is not needed for host-model metadata.

[scrasmussen]

Fixed, thanks for the feedback!

[scrasmussen]

Were all new additions to scm_physical_constants.F90/meta from UFS? (e.g. did you have to come up with any new metadata?)

The metadata changes here are all ones that I came up with (based on the comments in the physics and physcon files). I was able to find existing definitions for a lot of physcon variables but not for these references. I may have missed something but I did check the UFSATM/ccpp/data/*.meta files and the existing metadata files in the SCM.

[grantfirl]

@scrasmussen Unfortunately, this may need some more attention after the capgen-ng merge. I noticed several changes to physcons. Hopefully, it isn't too much additional work.

[scrasmussen]

@scrasmussen Unfortunately, this may need some more attention after the capgen-ng merge. I noticed several changes to physcons. Hopefully, it isn't too much additional work.

@grantfirl thanks for the heads up! I was wanting to update this to test the new physcons-less CCPP physics (once I work out those last few bugs and submit the PRs) so shouldn't be too much additional work