Skip to content

Fix file descriptor cleanup on OpenBSD #571

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Open
fabienr wants to merge 1 commit into
base: develop
Choose a base branch
from
Open

Fix file descriptor cleanup on OpenBSD #571

Show file tree
Hide file tree
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
1 commit
Select commit
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
4 changes: 3 additions & 1 deletion include/boost/process/v1/detail/posix/handles.hpp
View file
Open in desktop
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -133,7 +133,9 @@ struct limit_handles_ : handler_base_ext
if (std::find(used_handles.begin(), used_handles.end(), conv) != used_handles.end())
continue;

if (::close(conv) != 0)
int error;
while ((error = ::close(conv)) == -1 && errno == EINTR);
if (error == -1 && errno != EBADF)
{
exec.set_error(::boost::process::v1::detail::get_last_error(), "close() failed");
return;
Expand Down
40 changes: 39 additions & 1 deletion src/posix/close_handles.cpp
View file
Open in desktop
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -24,12 +24,20 @@
//
// gives us
//
// int closefrom(int fd);
// void closefrom(int lowfd);

@fabienr fabienr Oct 25, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Just notice that FreeBSD closefrom differ from OpenBSD; see the comment below

@fabienr fabienr Nov 2, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Finally it looks better to split them.

// int close_range(u_int lowfd, u_int highfd, int flags);

#include <unistd.h>
#define BOOST_PROCESS_V2_HAS_CLOSE_RANGE_AND_CLOSEFROM 1

#elif defined(__OpenBSD__)

// https://man.openbsd.org/closefrom.2
// int closefrom(int fd);

#include <unistd.h>
#define BOOST_PROCESS_V2_HAS_CLOSEFROM_WITH_ERRNO 1

@fabienr fabienr Nov 2, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

bikeshed, WITH_EINTR ?

@klemens-morgenstern klemens-morgenstern Nov 2, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I thought the difference is the return type of the closefrom signature?


#elif defined(__sun)

/*https://docs.oracle.com/cd/E36784_01/html/E36874/closefrom-3c.html
Expand Down Expand Up @@ -113,6 +121,36 @@ void close_all(const std::vector<int> & whitelist, error_code & ec)
ec = BOOST_PROCESS_V2_NAMESPACE::detail::get_last_error();
}

#elif defined(BOOST_PROCESS_V2_HAS_CLOSEFROM_WITH_ERRNO)

// OpenBSD impl - whitelist must be ordered
void close_all(const std::vector<int> & whitelist, error_code & /*ec*/)
{
//the most common scenario is whitelist = {0,1,2}
if (!whitelist.empty())
{
if (whitelist.front() != 0) {
for (int fd = 0; fd < whitelist.front(); fd++)
while (::close(fd) == -1 && errno == EINTR);
}
for (std::size_t idx = 0u;
idx < (whitelist.size() - 1u);
idx++)
{
const auto mine = whitelist[idx];
const auto next = whitelist[idx + 1];
if ((mine + 1) != next && (mine != next))
{
for (int fd = mine + 1; fd < next; fd++)
while (::close(fd) == -1 && errno == EINTR);
}
}
while (::closefrom(whitelist.back() + 1) == -1 && errno == EINTR);
}
else
while (::closefrom(0) == -1 && errno == EINTR);
}

#elif defined(BOOST_PROCESS_V2_HAS_CLOSE_RANGE_AND_CLOSEFROM)

// freeBSD impl - whitelist must be ordered
Expand Down