Add aggregate semantics to Policy Compiler - #1052
Merged
Merged
Conversation
copybara-service
Bot
force-pushed
the
test_913930387
branch
4 times, most recently
from
May 12, 2026 21:10
a194d42 to
634780b
Compare
copybara-service
Bot
force-pushed
the
test_913930387
branch
11 times, most recently
from
May 13, 2026 23:37
6714afc to
380bcf3
Compare
copybara-service
Bot
force-pushed
the
test_913930387
branch
2 times, most recently
from
May 20, 2026 21:38
7d705ad to
f319900
Compare
copybara-service
Bot
force-pushed
the
test_913930387
branch
10 times, most recently
from
July 31, 2026 20:38
d97200e to
913d2b1
Compare
Aggregate walks through all matching rules (including nested ones) and appends them into a list:
```yaml
rule:
aggregate:
- condition: "true"
emit: "'FOO'"
- condition: "true"
emit: "'BAR'"
# Output: ['FOO', 'BAR']
```
Few noteworthy design decisions below. All examples assume all conditions matched:
1. For usability reasons, subrules under an aggregate ancestor will always have their **lists flattened**:
```YAML
name: aggregate_flat_flattening_example
rule:
aggregate:
- rule:
match:
- condition: "resource.is_admin == true"
output: "['GDPR_STANDARD', 'EU_B2C_NOTICE']"
- condition: "true"
emit: "'FALLBACK'"
# Output: ['GDPR_STANDARD', 'EU_B2C_NOTICE', 'FALLBACK']
```
2. Base case of an aggregate rule is an empty list. Nested conditional rules within an aggregate rule which outputs `optional.none()` are pruned (except in cases where policy output explicitly emits an `optional.none()`):
```YAML
name: optional_pruning_example
rule:
aggregate:
- rule:
match:
- condition: "1 == 2"
output: "'EU_NOTICE'"
- condition: "true"
emit: "'ALWAYS'"
# Output: ['ALWAYS']
```
```YAML
name: explicit_optional_none_example
rule:
aggregate:
- rule:
match:
- condition: "resource.is_b2c == true"
output: "optional.none()" # Explicitly authored by user
- condition: "true"
emit: "optional.of('ALWAYS')"
# Output: [optional.none(), optional.of('ALWAYS')]
```
Note: nesting `aggregate` clauses is currently not allowed, and will result in a compilation error.
PiperOrigin-RevId: 957321565
copybara-service
Bot
force-pushed
the
test_913930387
branch
from
July 31, 2026 21:01
913d2b1 to
8d150b2
Compare
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Add aggregate semantics to Policy Compiler
Aggregate walks through all matching rules (including nested ones) and appends them into a list:
Few noteworthy design decisions below. All examples assume all conditions matched:
optional.none()are pruned (except in cases where policy output explicitly emits anoptional.none()):Note: nesting
aggregateclauses is currently not allowed, and will result in a compilation error.