Enhanced License Check

[dmatej]

• As we are getting blacklisted from data websites, we have to limit the usage
• Now the check can be executed manually using /check-license comment
• It will be still manually executed daily on main branch
• It can be executed also from the Actions menu
• Removed staging profile
• Switched to Temurin JDK
• Related GitLab issue: https://gitlab.eclipse.org/eclipsefdn/helpdesk/-/work_items/7694

Validation of this PR

• First I pushed the updated action file to the branch 4.x in my own repository and I set it as the main branch.
• Then I created another branch with any trivial change, and PR to 4.x
• Then I commented the PR with /check-license (/license-check works too)

The check passed, and the PR automatically received this comment: dmatej#126 (comment)

Then I closed the PR. Failure should not block merge of the PR.

Notes

• The comment will not work until we merge this PR, that is why I had to use my own repo for testing.
• The summary in the comment is trimmed by GitHub, the original file can be downloaded from the action run.

[dmatej]

/check-license

[dmatej]

@pzygielo I started doing experiments on my repository, so don't burn your time with this one yet.

[dmatej]

/check-license

[dmatej]

@pzygielo Now it is ready, just the new configuration will start working after the merge, so trying these comments now is worthless. But I have tested it in my own repo and added results to the PR description. I can also run the action manually against selected branch (in the same repository):

[pzygielo]

@dmatej - seems it was activated on my comment for https://github.com/dmatej/jersey/actions/runs/30164949485

so.... it will react on comment from anyone? 🤔

[dmatej]

@dmatej - seems it was activated on my comment for https://github.com/dmatej/jersey/actions/runs/30164949485

so.... it will react on comment from anyone? 🤔

Great question, I will fix it!

[dmatej]

@pzygielo Can you try that now?

[pzygielo]

Can you try that now?

Better - it was skipped.

👍

[pzygielo]

I can't see anything similar to the code from fork:
contains(fromJSON('["OWNER","MEMBER","COLLABORATOR"]'), github.event.comment.author_association)
to be applied here.

[pzygielo]

I can't see anything similar to the code from fork: contains(fromJSON('["OWNER","MEMBER","COLLABORATOR"]'), github.event.comment.author_association) to be applied here.

@dmatej - see

• Terminate SseEventSource gracefully on HTTP 204 during (re)connect #6120 (comment)
• which caused https://github.com/eclipse-ee4j/jersey/actions/runs/32837743341 to run
• but I'm foreign party for jersey, especially - not an owner, member, collaborator...