Skip to content

Fix audit findings pmp chm - #3347

Merged
PandaeDo merged 8 commits into
mainfrom
fix_audit_findings_pmp_chm
Oct 19, 2026
Merged

PandaeDo merged 8 commits into
mainfrom
fix_audit_findings_pmp_chm

Conversation

@masc2023

@masc2023 masc2023 commented Oct 17, 2026 •

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Improvement

Description

Aligns SCORE's Change Management Plan with the ISO 26262-8:2018 clarifications tracked by
process_description audit issue eclipse-score/process_description#567 and drafted in
eclipse-score/process_description#834 (8.4.1.2, 8.4.1.3, 8.4.2.2, 8.4.3.1, 8.4.4.2).

Adds four small, non-behavioral clarifications to
docs/platform_management_plan/change_management.rst:

  • Change Management Scope subsection: identifies which work products/items are subject to
    change management by reusing the existing identification in the Configuration Management
    Plan, and states that it applies for their complete lifecycle,
    distinct from an individual Change Request's Milestone/Expected Implementation Version.
  • One sentence summarizing what the existing Impact Analysis Template covers (interfaces,
    connected elements, affected-vs-modified work products, distributed-development
    responsibilities, safety impact, implementation/verification timing)
  • One sentence clarifying that a Change Request's date is the ISSUE creation date (GitHub
    metadata) and that its starting release version is the main baseline state at creation
    time (identifiable via the linked PR's base commit), distinct from the target Expected
    Implementation Version.
  • One sentence clarifying that the implementer of an accepted Change Request is recorded via
    the ISSUE's Assignees field and/or linked implementation PRs/Issues, reusing the same
    convention already used in problem_resolution.rst.

No changes to workflows, FEP routing, responsibilities, approval gates, states, or compliance
tags. docs/platform_management_plan/config_management.rst and the shared .github issue
forms were inspected but not modified (out of scope / not owned by this repo).

Follow-up (outside this repo): once process_description#834 merges and SCORE's
score_process_description pin is bumped past v2.1.2, revisit whether the upstream
guideline/template updates make any of this wording redundant.

Validation

  • bazel run //:docs — build succeeded, no new warnings/errors.
  • git diff --check — passed, no whitespace issues.

Related ticket

closes N/A — no SCORE-side issue exists; tracked upstream by
eclipse-score/process_description#567 and eclipse-score/process_description#834.

@github-actions

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Documentation preview for this pull request is available at:
pr-3347: https://eclipse-score.github.io/score/pr-3347/

@PandaeDo
PandaeDo merged commit cf03727 into main Oct 19, 2026
10 checks passed
@PandaeDo
PandaeDo deleted the fix_audit_findings_pmp_chm branch October 19, 2026 08:38
@github-project-automation github-project-automation Bot moved this from Backlog to Done in S-CORE Roadmap Oct 19, 2026
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

Status: Done
Status: Done

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants