Skip to content

rfc14 range power-of-x operator - #568

Open
sam-maloney wants to merge 2 commits into
flux-framework:masterfrom
sam-maloney:maloney-rfc14-range-power-operator
Open

sam-maloney wants to merge 2 commits into
flux-framework:masterfrom
sam-maloney:maloney-rfc14-range-power-operator

Conversation

@sam-maloney

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Problem: the current definition of the '^' operator as "exponentiation" does not address the most likely intended use case

Change the definition to specify that only counts that are a perfect "power of X" are valid

Problem: the text says that both must be present if either is, but both
have well defined defaults, and this is (intentionally) not enforced in
the implementation

Remove the statement, so the RFC agrees with the code
Problem: the current definition of the '^' operator as "exponentiation"
does not address the most likely intended use case

Change the definition to specify that only counts that are a perfect
"power of X" are valid
@github-actions

github-actions Bot commented Nov 6, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

⚠️ linkcheck failed with status code 2

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant