docs: improve readme structure

[MegaRedHand]

Reorganize sections and update community and contributing information.

🗒️ Description / Motivation

• What does this PR change?
• Why is this change needed?
• What problem does it solve?

What Changed

• List the files or areas touched
• Brief summary of each change

Correctness / Behavior Guarantees

• What invariants are preserved or updated?
• Are there any behavior changes reviewers should know about?

Tests Added / Run

• What tests were added or updated?
• What commands did you run to verify this change?

Related Issues / PRs

• Closes #
• Related to #

✅ Verification Checklist

• Ran make fmt — clean
• Ran make lint (clippy with -D warnings) — clean
• Ran make test (cargo test --workspace --profile release-fast) — all passing

[greptile-apps]

Your trial has ended. Reactivate Greptile to resume code reviews.

[MegaRedHand]

Moved to the bottom of the readme

[github-actions]

🤖 Kimi Code Review

This PR contains documentation-only changes to README.md with no code modifications. Here is the review:

No code correctness, security, or consensus issues found — the diff consists solely of markdown section reorganization.

Documentation structure observations:

1. Line 82-85: The new Documentation section correctly uses relative linking (./docs) alongside the absolute URL. Consider verifying the docs.ethlambda.xyz domain is properly configured and HTTPS-enabled, as this is the primary entry point for new users.

2. Line 144-154: Moving "Community" and "Contributing" to the end follows standard open-source documentation conventions (users see technical content first, engagement second). This improves readability.

3. Line 82: The use of the book emoji (## 📖 Documentation) introduces inconsistency with other headers that use plain text. While not blocking, consider removing the emoji for consistency with the minimalist philosophy described in line 86+.

Action required: None. The PR is safe to merge.

---

Note: As this contains no Rust code, consensus logic, or cryptographic implementations, no security audit of execution paths, memory safety, or SSZ/XMSS validation was applicable.

---

Automated review by Kimi (Moonshot AI) · kimi-k2.5 · custom prompt

[github-actions]

🤖 Codex Code Review

No findings.

This PR only reorganizes README.md content and adds a documentation section at README.md. It does not modify Rust code, consensus logic, SSZ handling, signature verification, networking, or any state transition / fork choice paths, so I do not see correctness, security, or performance risk from the diff as submitted.

Residual note: I did not run tests because the change is documentation-only and there are no executable code changes to validate.

---

Automated review by OpenAI Codex · gpt-5.4 · custom prompt

[github-actions]

🤖 Claude Code Review

Confirmed: both CONTRIBUTING.md and docs/ exist, so the relative links are valid. This PR is safe to merge as a docs-only reorganization — no functional or correctness issues found.

---

Automated review by Claude (Anthropic) · sonnet · custom prompt