Skip to content

docs: record staircase revalidation and correct EXIF example - #30

Merged
nicolasdiolez merged 1 commit into
devfrom
codex/dev-staircase-revalidation
Nov 1, 2026
Merged

nicolasdiolez merged 1 commit into
devfrom
codex/dev-staircase-revalidation

Conversation

@nicolasdiolez

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner

The checked-in staircase capture plan disabled EXIF intrinsics even though the measured pilot enabled them. Set the example to exif_intrinsics: true and record the fresh 16/31-capture comparison performed on merged dev (3bba6be, after #29).

  • Add a dated report and structured measurements: all 96 common JPEGs and 16 common masks per consumer profile match by SHA-256. Postshot fails at 16 captures and trains 118/186 views to 5,000 steps at 31; the dense project was saved and reopened. RealityScan's largest component grows from 8 to 58 views, while both cases retain 12 components.
  • Update the roadmap and changelog, and link the follow-up from the historical reports without changing their original measurements. Prioritize consumer-result import, mask association/persistence and controlled repeatability checks. Application defaults and diagnostic limits remain unchanged.

Validation: the existing historical-staircase capture-plan test passed (1 test); Ruff, scripts/check_release.py, JSON/local-link checks and git diff --check passed. The full test suite was not rerun for this documentation/example change.

Limits: one fresh run per arm; consumer counts vary despite identical input bytes and reported alignment settings. Five unmatched-mask warnings persist on Postshot reopen. This does not qualify final geometry, held-out splat quality, Windows extraction or a distributed binary. Media, native projects and private evidence are not included.

@nicolasdiolez
nicolasdiolez marked this pull request as ready for review November 1, 2026 22:13
@nicolasdiolez
nicolasdiolez merged commit ad2b108 into dev Nov 1, 2026
20 checks passed
@nicolasdiolez
nicolasdiolez deleted the codex/dev-staircase-revalidation branch November 2, 2026 10:33
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant