[BridgeAR]

Link-time optimization and selective inlining reduce median warm parsing CPU by 12.7%, 8.8%, and 12.5% for small, medium, and large application modules. The control uses default flags. The binary grows from 22,639 to 25,277 bytes.

Measurements use Node 22.23.4/V8 12.4 on macOS arm64 and five fresh processes. Each process has 50,000 warmup calls per variant and seven interleaved batches with trimmed CPU means. Median cold import, initialization, and first-file parsing measures 1.851 ms with default flags and 1.963 ms with this build.

[guybedford]

Thanks for this. I rebuilt the binary from the pinned wasm-builder container and it is byte-identical to the committed lib/lexer.wasm, and all tests pass in all three modes.

The perf result doesn't reproduce on x86_64 Linux though (Node 22.21.1, isolated processes, trimmed mean of 7 batches, test/samples inputs). I also split the two flags to see which one is responsible:

input	base	PR (-flto + threshold 150)	-flto only	threshold 150 only
exports.a = 1; module.exports.b = 2;	0.568us	0.505 (-11%)	0.575 (0%)	0.550 (-3%)
rollup.min.js	1996us	1880 (-6%)	1946 (-2.5%)	1890 (-5%)
lexer.js	154us	161 (+4%)	154 (0%)	167 (+8%)
magic-string.js	99us	119 (+19%)	98 (0%)	115 (+16%)

angular / d3 / rollup unminified were -1% to -3%.

So -flto on its own is perf-neutral and shrinks the binary (22369 -> 22057 bytes), while all of the size growth and all of the perf delta, both the wins and the regressions, come from -inline-threshold=150. A global inline threshold is going to be sensitive to the host JIT's register allocation and code layout per architecture, which is consistent with it helping on arm64 and hurting the hot scanning loops for unminified mid-sized files on x86_64.

Suggestions:

• Keep -flto.
• Drop the global -inline-threshold=150, or back it with x86_64 Linux numbers showing no regressions across the sample set.
• If specific call sites matter, targeted __attribute__((always_inline)) / noinline in src/lexer.c would be deterministic across platforms and easier to review than a global heuristic.

Minor: with -flto the link-time -Wl,--mllvm=-inline-threshold is the one that drives the main pipeline, so the compile-time -mllvm copy is mostly redundant.

[guybedford]

Thanks for this, and for the careful measurements. I rebuilt the binary with the pinned toolchain (build-wasm-local, wasi-sdk 21 / binaryen 116) and it is byte-identical to the committed lib/lexer.wasm, and the full suite passes in all three modes.

I did an interleaved A/B of flag variants on the same src/lexer.js, Node 22.21 / V8 12.4, Linux x86_64. Medians over 60 shuffled rounds after warmup, all after wasm-opt -Oz:

Build	Size	Large samples	Medium (~3 KB)	Small (~150 B)
-Oz (control)	22401	0%	0%	0%
-Oz -flto -mllvm -inline-threshold=150 (this PR)	25065	-2%	-5.5%	-7.6%
-Oz -mllvm -inline-threshold=150 (no LTO)	25522	-1 to -2%
-Oz -flto only	22057	within noise
-O2	27121	-12 to -14%	-10%	-12%
-O3	27894	-13%	-10%	-14%

Cold start (import + init + first parse in fresh processes) was within noise across all of them, about 0.1 ms spread.

Two things fall out of this:

• -flto on its own does nothing here, which is expected for a single translation unit. The whole effect comes from the inline threshold.
• -mllvm -inline-threshold is an internal LLVM option without a stability guarantee across clang versions, while plain -O2 is a stable public flag and gave roughly twice the speedup for another ~2 KB.

So the real decision seems to be how much inlined binary size the loader is willing to pay, and if some is acceptable, -O2 looks like the better point on that curve. Could you run -O2 through your arm64 harness alongside the current flags? If it holds up there too, I'd prefer that over the LTO / threshold pair.

Separately, the stack is based on 2.3.0 and the src/lexer.js change in #134 conflicts with #131 on main, so both will need a rebase before landing.

[guybedford]

On a single translation unit -flto had no measurable effect on its own in my runs (see the table in the review body); the gain is entirely from the inline threshold. If the threshold approach stays, this could be dropped along with the -Wl,--mllvm duplicate below, but see the review for the -O2 comparison.