Repository navigation
Conversation
Coverage Report for CI Build 39720696646Warning Build has drifted: This PR's base is out of sync with its target branch, so coverage data may include unrelated changes. Warning No base build found for commit Coverage: 90.354%Details
Uncovered ChangesNo uncovered changes found. Coverage RegressionsRequires a base build to compare against. How to fix this → Coverage Stats
💛 - Coveralls |
bencap
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Implementation looks good! I think we should also add a couple router tests that assert the behavior at the user level:
- A test that new uploads with an accession column fail validation and return the appropriate error to the user.
- A test that exporting an accession column returns a 200.
| # ruff: noqa: E402 | ||
|
|
||
| import pytest | ||
|
|
||
| fastapi = pytest.importorskip("fastapi") | ||
|
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I think this can come out of the file now since the stuff upstream is merged. But if there are errors again lmk.
bin/check's ruff format disagreed with the local pinned version on how to lay out the multi-line CSV string literals. Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
No description provided.